Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_6.mat
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -7.03, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.35, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -6.79, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -5.63, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.91, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UAAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -6.04, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCAGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAACGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GUGUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.73, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -12.11, deficit 10.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GGUUGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUGUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCAUCC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.88, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GACUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCAAA 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.06, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGUGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
UAAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.29, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAGG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.21, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACAUUU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.32, deficit -0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGGAAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.96, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUUUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -6.04, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGCCGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCGGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -8.68, deficit  4.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score     -10.29, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUCGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GCAGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -6.08, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.76, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGUAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCACAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.79, deficit  1.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGCCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUGGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGACUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.44, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.90, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGCUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.37, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUUCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.04, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UCGAAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.89, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
AUCGGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.33, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAGAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.39, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCAAUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.96, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
AACGUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GGUUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CCCAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.41, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAGAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAGUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.51, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGCCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UUACCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.93, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.62, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGACGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.48, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.59, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUAAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.03, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AGGGGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.46, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.51, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUGUUUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.79, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UUGAACA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.25, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUUUGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.67, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UUUGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -8.59, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGGUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.64, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAAACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.01, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GGUUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AGGCUAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.11, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAGUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.80, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUUGGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.75, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CCCUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCGCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.17, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
AAGAAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.83, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUAGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.43, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUCGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGUUUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.22, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CCAUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CGGAUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCGCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.69, deficit  1.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUCCAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.76, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.96, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GCGGAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.23, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UGUUCAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.02, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GCAAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.00, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
UAAAAAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.44, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGCCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.87, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAGACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.34, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUCUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.25, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GUCUUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGUGAGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.30, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUUGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -11.05, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
ACCUCUAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGAAUAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.33, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GGUGCGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.37, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUGGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -6.98, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGAAUAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.24, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UCUGAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -9.44, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.72, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GCGUUGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -9.65, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AGAAAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.02, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.05, deficit  6.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUGCACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score     -11.07, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UAAACUAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.36, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CAAAAUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.47, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.98, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUCUAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.20, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCCCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAAACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.56, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUGAUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.34, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GCACUACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.11, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
AUCAGGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.93, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAUCAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -9.92, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
CGACAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.37, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUGACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UCGCCGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.93, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGGUAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -11.14, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAUUAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGAGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.57, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCAGAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.82, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UAUCUUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.85, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCGUUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.65, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
UUCGGGAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUUGAGAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.29, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUCUUAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.97, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
AGAGCCGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGCAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UUAAGCCUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.47, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CGUCUCAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score     -10.34, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUAAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.75, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGAGAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.83, deficit  0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
AUAAAAAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.51, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUCAAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UGAGUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.74, deficit  9.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGAACUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCGGCGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.13, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCAUCUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.26, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUAGUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.62, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGUGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -12.53, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUGAAUUCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.45, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGCUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -5.86, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GUUUCUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.04, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CGCCACCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.04, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACCAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -13.93, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GCUGAAACC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -7.19, deficit  2.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AAAAAAGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.55, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CUUAAGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAACGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.35, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUGUGACUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.44, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CGCCGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.62, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAGAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -8.08, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUCAAUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -8.46, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGCUGUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.75, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CUAAUGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.96, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUUACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.32, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCCCCCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.75, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGAUGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGAGAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.85, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GUUUUAGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.33, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGGAAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.40, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CACAAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.38, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UAAAGAAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.32, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGCUGUGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.36, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
CUUUAAACG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.84, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
UAAAUUACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -7.69, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CCUAGGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CGUUGCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.29, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CCAACAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CCAAGCCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -10.91, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUUAAGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.73, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUAAGGGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.16, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCGGGAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.86, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
UGGUGGGAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
AAGCGAAUCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score      -9.58, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.10, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCUAUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAUUCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.73, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGGAGACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -12.92, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CCAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.37, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUUAAGAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.13, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CUAAACCGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UGGCCAUCGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.89, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGAAGCUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.10, deficit  7.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGAGAAUCAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUCGACAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGGUCCUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.95, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
UGCUGAUGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.77, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGCGGUGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score      -8.66, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
UGGAGGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.04, deficit  7.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAUCACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.07, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGCUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.62, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGCAACAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.72, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAUUGGAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.83, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGCAAGAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.53, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUCCCAUCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.33, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CACUUGCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.04, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CUUGAGAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.17, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GCGUCACGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -12.71, deficit  7.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
AAGGGAGAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.54, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGAUAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.91, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAGGGAUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.55, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GUUGCUUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.91, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUCAGGAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.39, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAGAAACACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.58, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGCACGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.29, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUCGAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score     -14.16, deficit  9.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GGAUGAUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -15.68, deficit 10.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GAAAAACCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.54, deficit  9.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAUGGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.21, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGGCAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -11.57, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGCAACGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCGCCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGGAGGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUCAUACAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AGCGAAAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.69, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UUGUUAACCCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -15.07, deficit 10.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CAAAGUCGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.62, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGUUUUCUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.14, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GGACACCUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.92, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAAACUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.32, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGGUAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.42, deficit  5.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGCAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.55, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCAUGCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.64, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGUUACAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.57, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUGAGGUCAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGUAAUUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.26, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AGAACGUGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.99, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUUCGAGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.41, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGAAACCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.29, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGCGGAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -14.26, deficit  8.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
UUAAGAAGGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -15.45, deficit 11.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAGAGAGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.49, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAACAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.80, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGACCCUGCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.08, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGACGAGGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.66, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGUCAGGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.49, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUCUUAAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.18, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAACCAUAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.35, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAAAGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGUAAGGAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.81, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACGGAGGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.94, deficit  9.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGACCUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.43, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAGUAUAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score      -8.02, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUCUUGAAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -16.72, deficit 12.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UUGCAAAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.89, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAGUGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.13, deficit  8.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUGUUGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.63, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUGAAGAGGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.66, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCACACCAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.12, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.43, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAUCUUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.27, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UUACGCUCGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.91, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AAACGAAUUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.26, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUUUAAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.93, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGUCCUUGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.08, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.06, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GCUACAAACGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.47, deficit  7.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GCAAGCUAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.35, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAUAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.20, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UUUUGGACAACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.80, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.49, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUAAUAGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GACGUUUGGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.06, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGACACCAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.68, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.57, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCCAUUUUUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.17, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.05, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GGAAAGUAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.39, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGGCACAUCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.37, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGGAACGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.58, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCCUAGAUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AGAAUUUAAACAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.74, deficit  7.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGAAGUGUCAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -11.40, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGCAGAAGAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -15.83, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
UAUAGAAAAAUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.78, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAUGAGAACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.97, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUCGCAGCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -18.08, deficit 10.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAACGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.91, deficit  7.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGUAAGAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.44, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.02, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAGUGAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -11.55, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CUAAGACCAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.34, deficit 10.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAGCCGGUCUACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12571.1, 13 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -15.30, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35
CCAAAGAGAAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.83, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.16, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.6667	 79.0000	4
5	100.0000	 89.3333	 52.0000	23
6	100.0000	 88.0000	 51.6667	60
7	 99.3333	 54.0000	 15.3333	51
8	 99.0000	 28.6667	  3.6667	46
9	 98.6667	 18.0000	  2.0000	68
10	 95.6667	  7.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 83.3333	  3.3333	  0.0000	42
12	 42.3333	  0.6667	  0.0000	23
13	 18.3333	  1.0000	  0.0000	12
14	  5.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  34 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  42 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  51 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 315 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 320 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 323 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 323 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 325 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 327 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 441 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 494 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 614 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2500%
Number of models giving false positives is 294 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.49
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.69
